Inserisci una parola o una frase in qualsiasi lingua 👆
Lingua:
Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT
In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:
- come viene usata la parola
- frequenza di utilizzo
- è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
- opzioni di traduzione delle parole
- esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
- etimologia
Cosa (chi) è U S Government peer review policies - definizione
U S Government peer review policies; U. S. Government peer review policies; US Government peer review policies
U.S. Government peer review policies
Most federal regulatory agencies in the United States government must comply with specific peer review requirements before the agencies publicly disseminate certain scientific information. These requirements were published in a Peer Review BulletinFederal Register Notice: text of Peer Review Bulletin.
Scholarly peer review
PROCESS OF SUBJECTING AN AUTHOR'S SCHOLARLY WORK, OR RESEARCH TO THE SCRUTINY OF OTHERS WHO ARE EXPERTS IN THE SAME FIELD
Open peer commentary; Academic review; Scholarly review; Peer review failure; Peer review failures; Peer-review failure; Academic peer review; Postpublication review; Open Peer Commentary; Post-publication peer review; Double-blind peer review; Scientific peer review; Rubriq; Refereed serial; PPPR; Result-blind peer review; Results blind peer review; Conclusion-blind review; Pre-accepted articles; Outcome-unbiased journals; Advance publication review; Registered reports; Prior to results submission; Result-blind reviewing; Blind review; Criticism of scholarly peer review; Desk reject; Desk rejection
Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review helps the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference.
Sham peer review
PROCESS OF PSEUDO-REVIEW DONE FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES, OFTEN IN HEALTHCARE
Malicious peer review; Sham peer review as mobbing
Sham peer review or malicious peer review is a name given to the abuse of a medical peer review process to attack a doctor for personal or other non-medical reasons. The American Medical Association conducted an investigation of medical peer review in 2007 and concluded that while it is easy to allege misconduct and 15% of surveyed physicians indicated that they were aware of peer review misuse or abuse, cases of malicious peer review able to be proven through the legal system are rare.
Wikipedia
U.S. Government peer review policies
Most federal regulatory agencies in the United States government must comply with specific peer review requirements before the agencies publicly disseminate certain scientific information. These requirements were published in a Peer Review Bulletin issued by the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which establishes "government-wide standards concerning when peer review is required and, if required, what type of peer review processes are appropriate."
